politicaleconomitalk

Who says Sara Palin is not qualified to be president?  The liberal media thats who.  But waite, Mr. Obama has less experience than Sarah Palin.  He has less than four years in the senate and two of those have been spent running for president.  Whats more his voting record in the senate shows he has been unabe to take a stance on any important issues.  He votes present instead of yes or no when he votes.  Is’ent that something.  Sarah Palin has exerience as a chief executive where she has had to take a stand on issues and she has been pretty successful, after all she took on big oil, corruption and put a stop to the bridge to nowhere.  Obama was a community organizer.  He worked with people like Jim ayres ( the whether man bomber from the sixties) and what about his anti american paster of many years and his personal anti Isreal sentaments.  Well those are just personal attacks on this poor man even if those thing are really reresentitive of his experience.  Poor man, he has a house worth over one million dolars.  Thats another personal attack.  Ok, lets tak about his experience.  Go aheah.  A, I’m drawing a blank, he really does not have any relavent experience to be president.  Exacty the point.  Sarah Palin on the other hand has had experience as chief executive of a state. You mean like Ronad Regan.  Yea, and that is the type expreience a person needs to be president beause that is what the president is, the chief executive of the U.S. Government. Well where is all this stuff about her being unqualidied comming from.  Wolf Blitzer, Loe Dobbs and the rest of the ultra liberls from CNN.  Who do you think made a big deal out of the worde robe issue (or non-issue as it is really) when obama has raised and spent an ungodly amount of money.  Most recent obscene spending being multi-millions for an infomercial.  They have’nt been able to come up with any real dirt on Sara Palin or her famiy so they try to blow petty non-relavent issues up out of proportion to make her look bad.   Is’ent it unethical for journalists to tryto slant the news to infuence their audiance.  It was years ago when I took Journalisn 101.  What has changed since then.  Nothing really, it is still unethical for journalists to try to slant the news the way they want.  They are supposed to be objective right.  That is right. 

Trackback URI | Comments RSS